An extensive study confirms that red meat might not be that bad for you. But it is bad for the planet, with chicken and pork less harmful than beef.
from Health https://ift.tt/2npZaT1
October 01, 2019
Rose
Health, Health - The New York Times
No comments
Related Posts:
Consent in the Digital Age: Can Apps Solve a Very Human Problem?Apps will let users set their sexual boundaries before intimacy, then solidify them in a legal agreement. But is this really the future of consent? from Health http://ift.tt/2GW4Ec7 … Read More
C-Sections and Gut Bacteria May Contribute to Overweight KidsOverweight mothers are more likely to have overweight babies, and the gut bacteria the babies inherit may in part be to blame. from Health http://ift.tt/2CP0119 … Read More
Seeking Solace, and Finding Strength, in Shared Soccer MemoriesAt West Bromwich Albion, a community health program brings together fans battling memory issues and helps them remember what they’ve seen, and who they are. from Health http://ift.tt/2FKsgBq … Read More
You Get Thirsty and Drink. How Does Your Brain Signal You’ve Had Enough?Researchers have identified a set of neurons in mice that may explain the swift sensation of satisfaction that comes after a drink of water. from Health http://ift.tt/2FeVJoW … Read More
The Challenge of Doctor-Patient Relations in the Internet AgeMore and more in my work as a university psychiatrist, I find students turning to the vast “expertise” of the web for advice. from Health http://ift.tt/2t5uDvD … Read More
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 comments:
Post a Comment