The rule that insurers have to provide a separate bill to show the amount being spent on the abortion coverage they provide is deeply unpopular outside of the antiabortion movement due to the administrative burden it's expected to cause. Abortion rights groups also condemn the rule, saying it will cause confusion and further stigmatize a legal form of health care. In other news on the health law: after three years in office President Donald Trump still hasn't delivered a "replacement" law; and more.
from Kaiser Health News https://ift.tt/2ZIBPe1
January 02, 2020
Rose
Health News, Kaiser Health News
No comments
Related Posts:
San Francisco Launches Initiative To Seek Out Drug Users And Offer Anti-Addiction Prescriptions On The StreetMedication-assisted treatment with buprenorphine, methadone and naltrexone is widely considered the most effective way to wean users off opioids, but a major barrier is getting people the treatment. "We can’t wait for addicts… Read More
At Site For Proposed Border Wall Sits A Community That’s Burdened By Poor Health"We're not just about the border wall or the river," says Rose Timmer, a community advocate. "We're about being fat, we're about being poor, we're about being illiterate." Such advocates are working to improve the health of t… Read More
There’s Still Little Proof To Back Up Hype Over Combination Cancer ImmunotherapiesAll the buzz over combining experimental immune-boosting drugs with checkpoint inhibitors could fizzle into disappointment. In other public health news: eye treatments, aging athletes, the E. coli outbreak, hearing aids, and … Read More
Screening Rates For Lung Cancer ‘Truly Abysmal,’ Study FindsThe rates for other screenings are usually between 60 to 80 percent, while less than 2 percent of patients are taking advantage of lung screenings which can catch cancer while its still curable. from Kaiser Health News https… Read More
Study Shows Breast Cancer Treatment Can Be Cut In Half: There’s No Longer A ‘Need To Throw The Kitchen Sink At It’Typically, Herceptin is used for a year to treat breast cancer patients, but a new study finds it is effective with six months of use. The drug can damage the heart, and so a shorter amount of time taking it can improve patie… Read More
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 comments:
Post a Comment